business, california, Central Valley, Ceres, Hughson, Lathrop, Manteca, Modesto, Newman, Oakdale, Patterson, Politics, Ripon, Riverbank, San Joaquin, Stanislaus County, Stockton, Stockton, Tracy, Turlock, Waterford

E-Verify for Legal Status Debated in Washington

UOPtakesonimmigrationandgirl9.15.10(bw) Washington, DC — on June 14th, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Lamar Smith (R-Texas) introduced House Resolution (HR) 2164 “the Legal Workforce Act” — a bill which expands the E-Verify system making it mandatory for all U.S. employers.
“E-Verify is a successful program to help ensure that jobs are reserved for citizens and legal workers,” explained Congressman Smith.


E-Verify was created in the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996.  It allows employers to electronically verify newly-hired employees’ legal status to work in the United States.  “The program quickly confirms 99.5% of work-eligible employees,” highlighted Smith.
 2011-BiLingual-Weekly-quarter-page-webThe National Council of la Raza (NCLR) voiced their concerns over, “This legislation… will do nothing to create jobs, it will place a burden on all job-seeking U.S. citizens and legal immigrants, and it will not fix our broken immigration system,” said Clarissa Martínez De Castro, NCLR Director of Immigration and National Campaigns.
“Today, over 250,000 American employers voluntarily use E-Verify and an average of 1,300 new businesses sign up each week,” said Smith, “outside evaluations have found that the vast majority of employers using E-Verify believe it to be an effective and reliable tool for checking the legal status of their employees.”
In addition to the potential burdens; others are concerned about the systems accuracy on verifying US Citizen Employees, “consider that in 2008, Intel Corp. reported that just over 12% of its workers were wrongly tagged as ineligible, according to the Migration Policy Center in Washington.” wrote the LA Times in its May 27, 2011 editorial —Immigration: You can’t rely on E-Verify. 
Luis Magaña, San Joaquin County activist noted, “the system is limited to the ethics of the user; this legislation does not prevents identity theft or stops dishonest employers who capitalize on the low-cost labor offered by the undocumented workforce.”
If enacted, he current paper-based I-9 system would be replaced with an electronic system, a gradual 2-year plan which would phase the program in based on business size, and agriculture business would have to check workers’ legal status within 36 months.
“Workers cannot afford to lose jobs in this economy because of database errors or employer misuse of a verification system…” Martínez De Castro concluded.



Bilingual Weekly is your source for community news in both English and Spanish covering

Latino News, Stockton news, Lodi news, Stanislaus News, Merced News, Tracy News, Manteca News, and many more!

About bilingualweekly

Bilingual Weekly News brings you community news in both English and Spanish, covering information such as Stockton News, San Joaquin News, Latino News, Hispanic News, Mexican-American News, Bilingual News, Government News, Political News, Arts News, Tracy News, Manteca News, Lodi News, Modesto News, Stanislaus News, Education News, Stockton Unified School District, San Joaquin County Office of Education, Health News, Environmental news, and much more!


One thought on “E-Verify for Legal Status Debated in Washington

  1. Who the hel! gives a rats butt what La Raza says. Their only interest is in protecting criminals illegals. LR, Southern Poverty Law Center and the ACLU exist to hamper any attempt at immigration enforcement. They have sued every state that has passed anti-ILLEGAL immigration laws, E-Verify, S-Comm, etc. These racist organizations should just move to Mexico, since they are useless to legal citizens. Not to mention, the side with Obama’s “social justice” nonsense, which basically gives everything to poor, lazy, irresponsible and illiterate at the expense of working, responsible people.

    Posted by Larazablows | July 14, 2011, 1:14 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: